Categories

Learning Carousel

Category » Data

Subcategories: Federal, State
  • pdf

    2008 Kids Count data book: State profiles of child well-being.

    1/1/08 - Annie E. Casey Foundation,

    This 19th annual KIDS COUNT Data Book provides national and state-by-state information and statistical trends on the conditions of America’s children and families. This year, the KIDS COUNT Data Book essay, “A Road Map for Juvenile Justice Reform,” looks at the nearly 100,000 youth confined to juvenile facilities on any given night in the United States, and what can be done to reduce unnecessary and inappropriate detention and incarceration and increase opportunities for positive youth...

  • pdf

    2009 Kids Count data book: Taking Results Seriously for Vulnerable Children and Families

    1/1/09 - Annie E. Casey Foundation,

    The 20th annual KIDS COUNT Data Book profiles the well-being of America’s children on a state-by-state basis and ranks states on 10 key measures of child well-being. The Data Book essay calls for a “data revolution” that uses timely and reliable information to track the progress and improve the lives of vulnerable children.

  • pdf

    A checklist for improving your annual performance report for indicator 13

    1/1/07 - National Secondary Transition Technical Asssistance Center,

    The Checklist provides a set of questions that states can use to evaluate the quality of their APR response to Indicator 13.

  • pdf

    A guide to analyzing data from the Family Outcomes Survey

    1/1/09 - Melissa Raspa, Kathleen Hebbeler, Don Bailey

    The Family Outcomes Survey (FOS) provides a way for state and local programs serving young children to assess the extent to which families have achieved a variety of outcomes. This document provides suggestions on how to analyze the data from the survey; the analyses can then be used to plan for program improvement. The document is written for state agency staff, but many of the suggested analyses could be carried out at the local level as well.

  • pdf

    A State Profile of Efforts to Create Culturally Responsive Educational Systems: Connecticut

    1/1/09 - Elizabeth Kozleksi, Amanda Sullivan, Kara Sujansky

    This report provides a snapshot of Connecticut’s efforts to provide for the education of students identified as having disabilities and students identified as CLD.2 We use NCCRESt’s conceptual framework for culturally responsive educational systems, which focuses on the connections between people, policies, and practices, to provide a schema for analyzing the relationships between federal, state, LEA, and school policies.

  • pdf

    A State Profile of Efforts to Create Culturally Responsive Educational Systems: North Carolina

    1/1/09 - Elizabeth Kozleski, Amanda Sullivan

    This State Profile provides a snapshot of North Carolina's efforts to address the disproportionate representation of students from culturally and linguistically diverse backgrounds in special education.

  • pdf

    A State Profile of Efforts to Create Culturally Responsive Educational Systems: Tennessee

    1/1/08 - Elizabeth Kozleski, Amanda Sullivan, Federico Waitoller

    This State Profile provides a snapshot of Tennessee's efforts to address the disproportionate representation of students from culturally and linguistically diverse backgrounds in special education.

  • pdf

    A State Profile of Efforts to Create Culturally Responsive Educational Systems: Wisconsin

    1/1/08 - Elizabeth Kozleski, Amanda Sullivan, Federico Waitoller

    This State Profile provides a snapshot of Wisconsin's efforts to address the disproportionate representation of students from culturally and linguistically diverse backgrounds in special education.

  • pdf

    Achieving Transparency in the Public Reporting of 2006-2007 Assessment Results

    1/1/09 - Debra Albus, Martha Thurlow, Chris Bremer

    The 2006-2007 school year was the eighth annual reporting period since disaggregating the performance of students with disabilities on state and district-wide assessments was required by the Individuals with Disabilities Education Act (IDEA). It is the fifth reporting period since the enactment of the No Child Left Behind Act (NCLB), and the eleventh in a series of National Center on Educational Outcomes (NCEO) reports documenting state public reporting practices. Historically, the number of...

  • pdf

    Age-appropriate transition assessment

    National Secondary Transition Technical Asssistance Center,

    While age-appropriate transition assessment is not defined in the law, there are some clues as to the intent within the NSTTAC Indicator 13 FAQ (www.nsttac.org) that was approved by Office of Special Education Programs, US Department of Education.

  • pdf

    America's children in brief: Key national indicators of well-being, 2008

    1/1/08 - The Federal Intreragency Forum on Child and Family Statistics,

    Statistical data on children and families collected through the coordination and integration of 22 federal agencies. Indicators are organized into seven sections: Family and social environment, economic circumstances, health care, physical environment and safety, behavior, education, and health.

  • pdf

    An analysis of State Performance Plan data for indicator 2 (Dropout)

    1/1/08 - National Dropout Prevention Center for Students with Disabilities,

    This report summarizes the NDPC-SD’s findings for Indicator 2 across the 50 states, commonwealths and territories, and the Bureau of Indian Education (BIE), for a total of 60 agencies. For the sake of convenience, in this report the term “states” is inclusive of the 50 states, the commonwealths, and the territories, as well as the BIE. The evaluation and comparison of dropout rates for the states was confounded by several issues, which are described in the context of the summary...

  • pdf

    An analysis of States’ Annual Performance Report data for Indicator 1 (Graduation)

    1/1/08 - National Dropout Prevention Center for Students with Disabilities,

    This report summarizes the NDPC-SD’s findings for Indicator 1 across the 50 states, commonwealths and territories, and the Bureau of Indian Education (BIE), for a total of 60 agencies. For the sake of convenience, in this report the term “states” is inclusive of the 50 states, the commonwealths, and the territories, as well as the BIE. The evaluation and comparison of graduation rates for the states was confounded by several issues, which are described in the context of the summary...

  • pdf

    Analysis of the developmental functioning of early intervention and early childhood special education populations in Oregon

    1/1/09 - Gary Nave, Vicki Nishioka, Arthur Burke

    This report informs Oregon education policy-makers about the developmental functioning levels of children from birth through age 2 in early intervention services and children ages 3-5 in early childhood special education services at the time of entry into services, using data from the Oregon Early Childhood Assessment System. The assessment system contains data on the assessed developmental functioning levels of children based on the 16 Oregon early childhood foundation areas and the three...

  • pdf

    Children of Immigrants: National and State Characteristics

    1/1/09 - Karina Fortuny, Randy Capps, Margaret Simms, Ajay Chaudry

    Accounting for 24% of children under age 5, the share of the school-age population who are children of immigrants will increase in the coming years. A brief from the Urban Institute describes the national and state characteristics of this subset of the U.S. population.

  • pdf

    Collecting post-school outcome data: Strategies for increasing response rates

    1/1/07 - Smith, S.C., & Bost, L.W.

    The brief contains an overview of the requirement to collect post-school outcome data and challenges experienced by states in collecting these data. Recommendations and strategies that states can use to secure sufficient response rates, especially from youth who drop out of school, are provided.

(51 Results) Page:  1 2 3 4